Difference between revisions of "WE01/Canonical"

From Genesys Documentation
Jump to: navigation, search
m (1 revision imported)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{SMART Meta
+
{{SMART Meta}}
|Solution=Workforce Engagement
 
|Title=Quality Assurance and Compliance
 
|Subtitle=Improve agent quality in handling interactions and gain insights to improve customer experience through recorded interactions, recorded desktop activity, quality evaluations and post-interaction web surveys.
 
}}
 
 
{{SMART Canonical
 
{{SMART Canonical
 +
|BuyerPersonas=Contact Center Supervisor / Manager, Head of Compliance, Head of Customer Experience
 +
|QualifyingQuestions=#Do you know if customers perceive that they receive the same quality of service regardless of the channel they use?
 +
#Are there any reliability issues with the current recording system?
 +
#How does your organization manage the quality of the interactions that your contact center handles with customers and prospects ?
 +
#How do you aggregate and report upon evaluation results (scores)?
 +
#How do you assess why some agents take longer to handle customer interactions than others?
 +
#Are there any concerns about agents accessing unauthorized information while handling interactions?
 +
#What communication channels do you offer your customers?
 +
|DataSheetImage=WE01 - Quality Assurance and Compliance - header.png
 
|PlatformChallenge=Contact centers today are required by law to record & reliably retain customer interactions across channels to reduce risk and meet regulatory compliance. They also need to record agent desktop activity during customer interactions to meet quality performance requirements and gain insight<s>s</s> to agent performance and compliance.  
 
|PlatformChallenge=Contact centers today are required by law to record & reliably retain customer interactions across channels to reduce risk and meet regulatory compliance. They also need to record agent desktop activity during customer interactions to meet quality performance requirements and gain insight<s>s</s> to agent performance and compliance.  
  
Line 15: Line 20:
  
 
Genesys post-interaction Survey is built in to the platform and offers a post-interaction satisfaction survey for all communication channels.
 
Genesys post-interaction Survey is built in to the platform and offers a post-interaction satisfaction survey for all communication channels.
 +
|PainPoints=*Inability to consistently meet SLA
 +
*High workforce cost due to overstaffing
 +
*Low customer satisfaction due to excessive wait times and low first contact resolution
 +
*Low employee engagement due to high work pressure, receiving interaction types they cannot handle and ever changing schedules
 +
*Poor CX due to understaffing
 +
*Insufficient data for accurate forecasting
 +
*Real performance/SLA not in line with forecast/schedule prediction
 +
|DesiredState=*Gain better insight into effectiveness of several forecasting/scheduling scenarios
 +
*Create an accurate forecast across all activities/queues that take in to account specific arrival patterns for digital interactions.
 +
*Automatically gather data for accurate forecasting from contact center platform
 +
*Real time insight into intraday SLA and schedule adherence
 
|HighLevelFlowLucid=https://www.lucidchart.com/documents/edit/b3e55247-b188-4160-972f-373100932e69/0
 
|HighLevelFlowLucid=https://www.lucidchart.com/documents/edit/b3e55247-b188-4160-972f-373100932e69/0
|BuyerPersonas=Contact Center Supervisor / Manager, Head of Compliance, Head of Customer Experience
 
|QualifyingQuestions=# Do you know if customers perceive that they receive the same quality of service regardless of the channel they use?
 
# Are there any reliability issues with the current recording system?
 
# Are you happy with the service and support that your current recording vendor provides?
 
# How does your organization manage the quality of the interactions that your contact center handles with customers and prospects ?
 
# How does your quality team select which interactions to evaluate?
 
# How do you aggregate and report upon evaluation results (scores)?
 
# How valuable would it be if interaction recordings could also allow you to see how agents navigate your systems while they're handling customer conversations?
 
# How do you assess why some agents take longer to handle customer interactions than others?
 
# Does your contact center agents comment about certain types of issues taking longer to handle due to systems issues?
 
# Are there any concerns about agents accessing unauthorized information while handling interactions?
 
# What communication channels do you offer your customers?
 
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{SMART DataSheetFlow
 
{{SMART DataSheetFlow
Line 52: Line 56:
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{SMART Benefits
 
{{SMART Benefits
|CanonicalBenefitID=Improved Customer Experience
+
|CanonicalBenefitID=Improved Net Promoter Score
 
|CanonicalBenefit=Use Quality Evaluations and post-interaction Surveys along with recording of voice and digital interactions to identify areas of improvement at the contact center level
 
|CanonicalBenefit=Use Quality Evaluations and post-interaction Surveys along with recording of voice and digital interactions to identify areas of improvement at the contact center level
 
as well as agent level to deliver a better customer experience.
 
as well as agent level to deliver a better customer experience.

Revision as of 09:39, April 27, 2020

Important
This information is shared by WE01 use cases across all offerings.

Administration Dashboard

Go back to admin dashboard to create and manage platform-specific use cases in the system:

Titles and Taxonomy

Main Title Subtitle Taxonomy Product Category Draft Published Edit

No draft


Canonical Information

Platform Challenge and Solution

Platform Challenge: Contact centers today are required by law to record & reliably retain customer interactions across channels to reduce risk and meet regulatory compliance. They also need to record agent desktop activity during customer interactions to meet quality performance requirements and gain insights to agent performance and compliance.

Contact centers need an easy to use interface for evaluating the quality of interactions and identify opportunities for improvement. Because it's not efficient to evaluate every interaction they need an automated method that allows them to focus on interactions that meet specific criteria, provides an efficient workflow and generates results.

Contact centers need an integrated survey solution, to gain insight into customer satisfaction/experience across channels, while also providing visibility to valuable contact center metrics.

Platform Solution: Genesys Cloud records and retains 100% of voice and digital customer interactions, to meet regulatory requirements and strategic quality improvement initiatives. In addition, recording the agent desktop activity provides further insight to help assess efficiency and effectiveness of agents in addressing customer needs. Simultaneous playback of recorded interactions along with agent desktop activity provides the needed visibility to identify and improvement opportunities.

Genesys Quality Evaluation includes flexible evaluation forms for use with any recorded interaction. The evaluation workflow provides both automated and ad-hoc assignment, easy access to results and scheduling for ad-hoc coaching. Quality Evaluation results enable contact centers to analyze performance for continuous agent improvement and improved customer experience.

Genesys post-interaction Survey is built in to the platform and offers a post-interaction satisfaction survey for all communication channels.

Platform Benefits

The following benefits are based on benchmark information captured from Genesys customers and may vary based on industry or lines of business:

Canonical Benefit Explanation
Improved Customer Experience Post-interaction Surveys along with recording of voice and digital interactions to identify areas of improvement at the contact center level as well as agent level to deliver a better customer experience.
Improved Employee Productivity Leverage the Quality evaluation criteria to create targeted evaluations to identify keys to successful sales and improve agent productivity
Improved First Contact Resolution Leverage the Quality evaluation results and Post interaction survey results to identify and address the root cause(s) of repeat contacts thereby improving FCRs.

High Level Flow

High Level Flow Steps

  1. Customer conversation on one of the available interaction channels gets recorded and retained.
  2. Recorded Voice Interactions are transcribed to text using Speech and Text analytics
  3. Recorded interactions are auto assigned to evaluators for assessment of agent performance (or for calibration)
  4. Option - Evaluator is able to search for/locate interaction recordings for ad-hoc evaluation assignment.
  5. Agent receives completed evaluation to review recordings and evaluation..Acknowledge and add comment.
  6. Customer is sent a Post Interaction survey based on Policy criteria and actions. Results are linked to the recorded interaction.
  7. Performance results are generated by Quality evaluation and Survey; Coaching , Learning Module assignment are initiated based on results.

Data Sheet Image

WE01 - Quality Assurance and Compliance - header.png

Canonical Sales Content

Personas

  • Contact Center Supervisor / Manager
  • Head of Compliance
  • Head of Customer Experience


Qualifying Questions

  1. Do you know if customers perceive that they receive the same quality of service regardless of the channel they use?
  2. Are there any reliability issues with the current recording system?
  3. How does your organization manage the quality of the interactions that your contact center handles with customers and prospects ?
  4. How do you aggregate and report upon evaluation results (scores)?
  5. How do you assess why some agents take longer to handle customer interactions than others?
  6. Are there any concerns about agents accessing unauthorized information while handling interactions?
  7. What communication channels do you offer your customers?

Pain Points (Business Context)

  • Inability to consistently meet SLA
  • High workforce cost due to overstaffing
  • Low customer satisfaction due to excessive wait times and low first contact resolution
  • Low employee engagement due to high work pressure, receiving interaction types they cannot handle and ever changing schedules
  • Poor CX due to understaffing
  • Insufficient data for accurate forecasting
  • Real performance/SLA not in line with forecast/schedule prediction

Desired State - How to Fix It

  • Gain better insight into effectiveness of several forecasting/scheduling scenarios
  • Create an accurate forecast across all activities/queues that take in to account specific arrival patterns for digital interactions.
  • Automatically gather data for accurate forecasting from contact center platform
  • Real time insight into intraday SLA and schedule adherence


Retrieved from "https://all.docs.genesys.com/WE01/Canonical (2025-06-19 14:15:10)"
Comments or questions about this documentation? Contact us for support!